Transforming a University into a Data-Rich, Literate Organisation: Reflections on the University of Law's journey

Andy Ramsden, Director of Technology Enhanced Teaching and Learning and Learning Analytics, The University of Law

Andy Ramsden, Director of Technology Enhanced Teaching and Learning and Learning Analytics, The University of Law

As with many institutions, the University of Law is on a transformational journey with its academic model. The starting point has been to articulate a new vision post COVID.

This discussion explores the steps we took to operational use this vision in terms of implementing Learning Analytics.

We adopted a five-step approach;

1. Articulate a vision for Learning Analytics within the broader vision of the academic model.

2. Assess our institutional readiness for implementing Learning Analytics

3. Write a Learning Analytics Adoption Plan

4. Implement the Adoption Plan

5. Continually improve based on feedback and evidence.

We positioned a vision for our use of Learning Analytics in our "Principles and Purposes of Learning Analytics" document. This outlined how we would use learning data to improve the student learning experience and outcomes.

The institutional readiness assessment combined a broader eMaturity model, with specific reference to Learning Analytics.

The findings highlighted strengths in terms of technical infrastructure, policy and processes. While, evidencing the need to improve the "people pillar" for high levels of adoption. The University of Law is fortunate to have three sector-leading analytics platforms, including SolutionPath. SolutionPath provides an understanding of student engagement across all aspects of academic learning. It provides real-time insight dashboards that help personal tutors proactively identify disengaged students and offer the right support to the right student at the right time.

The readiness assessment provided the priorities within the Adoption Plan. The Adoption Plan drew on good practices from across the HE sector and our software providers. For instance, we benchmarked our plan against Blackboard's Accelerating Analytics Adoption in Higher Education whitepaper.

The plan focused on developing a flourishing, vibrant community of practice (CoP) around Learning Analytics.

SolutionPath provides an understanding of student engagement across all aspects of academic learning

The challenge with developing CoP it's relatively easy to set up, however, the success depends on people visiting and engaging. Therefore, the initial focus was to provide the required staff development for stakeholders who needed to use SolutionPath (StREAM) to complete their responsibilities. The logic being that if we met people's immediate needs, we would ensure staff started to use the CoP. After undertaking a Training Needs Analysis exercise, we developed a learner pathway for staff delivered through micro-learning activities. The design principles were to provide short, self-paced learning opportunities which build a comprehensive knowledge of using Learning Analytics. The completion of each level would be recognised through a Learning Badge. The pathway for staff on using SolutionPath was;

Level 1 (Bronze): Getting Started with StREAM: A Personal Tutors Perspective

Level 2 (Silver): Understanding the data to improve decisions and interventions

Level 3 (Gold): What would you do? A problem-based workshop

The intended learning outcomes for the Level 1 module are;

• Explain to a friend or colleague the key principles and purpose of using Learning Analytics at the University of Law.

• Login into StREAM and navigate around the different parts of the screen, including how to search for specific students and see their engagement rating.

• Explain what is meant by the engagement rating from the perspective of StREAM

Be familiar with the suggested use cases for StREAM and apply these to your practice as a Personal Tutor.

The initial findings are positive of the Level 1 course when compared to traditional real-time workshops. Between the 12th and 30th July, 116 people registered for Level 1, of which 70 started the module, 62 started the assessment process, and 50 received their Certificate of Achievement.

Also, even if they didn't submit the assessment, they still spent on average 39 minutes in the module. While those who submitted they spent more time on task than a traditional webinar, with an average 107 minutes in the module and 43 minutes looking at content.

In conclusion, the key to the continuing success of this approach has been the time spent on strategic planning and engagement. This is a transformational change project, therefore, to reduce a person's resistance to change requires a clear understanding of why.

Weekly Brief

Read Also

Embracing AI to Transform Online Learning

Embracing AI to Transform Online Learning

Michael Ciocco, Ph.D., Associate Vice President for Online Learning, Rowan University
Navigating the Future of Higher Education IT with AI

Navigating the Future of Higher Education IT with AI

Vince Kellen, Chief Information Officer, University of California, San Diego
Building Inclusive Digital Ecosystems Where Students Thrive

Building Inclusive Digital Ecosystems Where Students Thrive

Bob Goeman, CIO, Metropolitan Community College
Cyber Preparedness: Protecting Students from Digital Dangers

Cyber Preparedness: Protecting Students from Digital Dangers

Troy Lunt, Technology Director, Data Privacy Manager, Iron County School District
Leading Inclusive and Smarter Learning

Leading Inclusive and Smarter Learning

Jennifer Van Wagner, Educational Technology Manager, Ohio Northern University
Redefining Student Success in the Digital Age

Redefining Student Success in the Digital Age

Doug McGee, Director of Teaching, Learning and Assessment, Idaho State University